Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03060
Original file (BC 2014 03060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03060

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry code (RE) of 2X (First Term, Second Term or Career 
Airman nonselected for reenlistment) and Separation Program 
Designator (SPD) code JGH (Non-retention on active duty) be 
changed to allow him to reenter military service.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His discharge and narrative reason are inequitable with his 
existing service record.  He served satisfactorily without any 
serious infractions.  His separation was processed as an expedited 
separation when it should have been processed as a regular 
separation.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 3 Jun 08, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the Regular 
Air Force.

On 2 Jun 14, the applicant was honorably discharged, with an RE 
code of 2X (First Term, Second Term or Career Airman nonselected 
for reenlistment) along with a SPD code of JGH (Non-retention on 
active duty), and was credited with six years of active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and 
D.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change 
his SPD code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an 
injustice.  On 19 Mar 14, the applicant’s commander initiated an 
AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, 
nonrecommending the applicant for reenlistment.  The commander 
noted the applicant was performing as an average airman, not ready 
to take on added responsibilities, verbally counseled on numerous 
occasions, received complaints regarding his work performance and 
showed no initiative at work, and did not lead the younger airman.  
The applicant also received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for having 
an unsecured firearm, a referral performance report for violating 
HIPPA/DOD regulations, LOR, placement on the control roster, and 
Unfavorable Information File (UIF).  The applicant acknowledged 
receipt and indicated he wished to appeal; however, there is no 
evidence the applicant submitted an appeal.  Based on the 
commander’s nonrecommendation for retention, the applicant was 
honorably discharged.

The applicant’s SPD code and his narrative reason for separation 
are correct as reflected on his DD Form 214.  Based on the 
documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, 
the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive 
requirement of the discharge regulation and was within the 
discretion of the discharge authority.  The applicant has not 
provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding the 
processing of his discharge.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation, with attachments, is 
at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change 
his RE code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an 
injustice.  According to AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, 
commanders have the authority to select or nonselect a service 
member for reenlistment.  Under the SRP, consideration is given to 
the service member’s performance report ratings, UIF, the member’s 
willingness to comply with Air Force standards, and the member’s 
ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty 
performance levels.

On 28 May 14, the applicant’s commander nonselected him for 
reenlistment noting several infractions under the Selective 
Reenlistment Program (SRP). The applicant acknowledged receipt and 
elected not to appeal.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is 
at Exhibit D.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-03060 in Executive Session on 19 May 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Jul 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 8 Aug 14,
             w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Sep 14,
             w/atchs.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 14.




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859

    Original file (BC 2013 04859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02198

    Original file (BC 2014 02198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of JGH (non-retention on active duty) and his Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP))be changed so that he can enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete DPSOA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00461

    Original file (BC-2011-00461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00461 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenlist into military service. Accordingly, if the Board is not compelled to grant the relief he seeks, his record will be administratively corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463

    Original file (BC 2013 03463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594

    Original file (BC 2014 00594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988

    Original file (BC 2014 01988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicant’s commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall “3” based upon the applicant’s failure to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281

    Original file (BC 2014 01281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “LGH” (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879

    Original file (BC 2013 04879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “2X” (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a “1” series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00931

    Original file (BC 2014 00931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00931 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220

    Original file (BC 2013 01220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...